Assistant Professor of Linguistics and Psychology
Cognition & Perception ,
Department of Linguistics &
Center for Neuromagnetism
Visit the Neurolinguistics Lab
Visit my Linguistics homepage
Fall 05 Courses:
Seminar in Neurolinguistics (G),
Neural Bases of Language (UG)
Previous teaching
Human language is a discrete combinatorial system of practically limitless expressive power. In my research I study the mental structures and neural bases underlying this uniquely human ability. In one line of research, I investigate the static representations of language, with a focus on elucidating the syntactic and semantic properties of the basic elements of linguistic computation. While these elements and their combination can be described with logic and grammar formalisms, we ultimately want to understand how language is biologically instantiated in the brain. With this goal in mind, most of my research effort is nowadays dedicated to uncovering the neural substrates of linguistic function. Discovery of such neural markers is a prerequisite for articulating a general functional neuroanatomy of language. But most importantly, I use neural correlates of linguistic processes as novel dependent measures to address questions about linguistic representation that are underdetermined by traditional theoretical and behavioral methods. As my primary technique to monitor brain activity, I use magnetoencephalography (MEG), which has the best combination of spatial and temporal resolution of all existing cognitive neuroscience techniques.
Properties of basic building blocks
While languages like English and Chinese, or Italian and Finnish, seem to differ from each other so vastly, decades of research in theoretical linguistics have revealed, and keep revealing, a common core underlying all languages. My research in theoretical linguistics has focused on elucidating how the verbal systems of human languages encode events, states and participant intentionality, both at the universal and language specific levels. If John rolls the ball, how does language encode the rolling of the ball, the event that causes it and John’s agentivity? Focusing on questions such as these, my dissertation, Introducing arguments (2002), described the verbal systems of a wide range of languages and proposed a tightly constrained universal system of elements that form the basic units of verbal derivation and event structure crosslinguistically.
Neural correlate of access to basic building blocks
Abstracting away from modality specific issues, natural language interpretation minimally involves activating the basic sound-meaning connections of language and combining them into complex, interpretable, representations. Thus a neural theory of language processing needs to minimally explain the neural bases of lexical access and this “combination,” or “merge,” to use the Chomskian terminology.
I and my colleagues have studied
the electromagnetism of word recognition and lexical access extensively. Figure 1 illustrates a characteristic MEG response elicited by visual words. We now have a body of evidence suggesting that access to morphological roots, or open-class morphemes, is indexed by the M350 response component, generated by left superior temporal areas. We have shown that the M350 tracks early, and not late, factors in lexical processing, and that it can be used to distinguish between representational identity and mere similarity in a way that behavioral reaction times cannot. For example, we have established special effects of
morphology and polysemy that can only be seen in the M350.
Fig. 1. MEG evoked response to visually presented words. Magnetic field maps
are plotted on top and dipole solutions in the bottom.
Neural bases of sentence-level semantic interpretation
While I continue to be interested in the M350 and lexical representation, much of my current research is focused on sentence-level semantic processing. We have recently reported that sentence-level semantic properties modulate activity in frontal regions, in the anterior midline field (AMF) (
Pylkkänen, Llinas & McElree, Biomag 2004). This establishes a starting point for a neural investigation of semantic composition. In particular, I hope to be able to use this activity to shed light on the controversial question of to what extent the syntactic and semantic systems of natural language are (in)separable.
back to the top
Biography Education
• Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002 (Linguistics)
• M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 1997 (Linguistics)
Positions
• Assistant Professor of Linguistics and Psychology, New York University, NY
(2004-present)
• Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychology, New York University & Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, New York University School of Medicine (2003 - 2004)
• Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Linguistics, New York University (2002 - 2003)
Affiliations
• Cognitive Neuroscience Society
• Linguistic Society of America
• Organization for Human Brain Mapping
Fellowships & Awards
• Invitation to be a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, Palo Alto, CA (2005).
• University Research Challenge Fund Award, New York University(2005).
• Provost’s Fellowship. Merit Fellowship awarded by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2000).
• Henry B. Roger's Fellowship. Merit Fellowship awarded by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1999).
Pylkkänen, L., Llinás, R. & McElree, B. (submitted). Distinct effects of semantic plausibility and semantic composition in MEG.
[pdf]
Pylkkänen, L., Gonnerman, L., Stringfellow, A., Marantz, A. (accepted pending revision). Disambiguating the source of phonological inhibition effects in lexical decision: an MEG study [pdf]. Cognitive Brain Research.
Pylkkänen, L., (in press). Introducing Arguments. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs Series. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pylkkänen, L. & McElree, B. (in press). The syntax-semantics interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning. In M. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2nd Ed). NY: Elsevier. [pdf]
Pylkkänen, L., Llinás, R. & Murphy, G. (in press). Representation of polysemy: MEG evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, [pdf]
McElree, B., Pylkkänen, L., Pickering, M., & Traxler, M. (in press). The time course of enriched composition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
[pdf]
Pylkkänen, L., Feintuch, S., Hopkins, E., & Marantz, A. (2004). Neural correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG study. Cognition , 91, B35-B45.
[pdf]
Pylkkänen, L., & Marantz, A. (2003). Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 187-189.
[pdf]
Pylkkänen, L., Stringfellow, A., & Marantz, A. (2002). Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: An MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density. Brain and Language, 81, 666–678.
[pdf]
Complete list of publications
Complete list of presentations
back to the top
Liina Pylkkänen
Assistant Professor of Linguistics and Psychology
Psychology office:
Department of Psychology
New York University
6 Washington Place,
Room 870
New York, NY 10003
Tel: (212) 998-8386
Fax: (212) 995-4018
Linguistics office:
Department of Linguistics
New York University
719 Broadway,
Room 426
New York, NY 10003
Tel: (212) 992-8764
Fax: (212) 995-4018
Email: liina.pylkkanen@nyu.edu
back to the top Updated
|
