On the classical statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems next up previous
Next: Acknowledgements

On the classical statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems

Mark E. Tuckerman
Dept. of Chemistry and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
New York University, New York, NY 10003

Christopher J. Mundy
Max-Planck Institut für Festkörperforschung
Heisenbergstrasse 1, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

Glenn J. Martyna
Dept. of Chemistry, Indiana University
Bloomington, IN 47405

(Published in Europhysics Letters 45, 149 (1999))



Abstract:

A consistent classical statistical mechanical theory of non-Hamiltonian dynamical systems is presented. It is shown that compressible phase space flows generate coordinate transformations with a nonunit Jacobian, leading to a metric on the phase space manifold which is nontrivial. Thus, the phase space of a non-Hamiltonian system should be regarded as a general curved Riemannian manifold. An invariant measure on the phase space manifold is then derived. It is further shown that a proper generalization of the Liouville equation must incorporate the metric determinant, and a geometric derivation of such a continuity equation is presented. The manifestations of the nontrivial nature of the phase space geometry on thermodynamic quantities is explored.

PACS numbers: 05.20.-y, 02.40.-k, 31.15.Qg




Classical statistical physics is traditionally based on a Hamiltonian formulation of mechanics. The phase space distribution function f(x,t) describing an ensemble of systems with coordinates and momenta tex2html_wrap_inline564 evolving according to Hamilton's equations of motion satisfies the Liouville equation,

  equation35

which is a statement of the conservation of f, df/dt=0. Accordingly, the average of an observable A(x) in such an ensemble is given by

  equation40

where n is the dimension of the phase space. The measure tex2html_wrap_inline574 in the definition of the average is preserved by Hamiltonian dynamics. That is, given a subset of systems with initial conditions in a phase space volume element tex2html_wrap_inline576 , the trajectories tex2html_wrap_inline578 obtained by solving Hamilton's equations of motion for each initial condition tex2html_wrap_inline580 will describe a volume element tex2html_wrap_inline582 in phase space such that tex2html_wrap_inline584 . This is tantamount to the incompressibility of phase space flow, which is a property satisfied by Hamiltonian systems. It is also tantamount to the condition that the Jacobian of the coordinate transformation specified by tex2html_wrap_inline578 is unity. The implication of an invariant measure is that Eq. (2) can be computed with respect to the phase space variables x at any time t.

Despite their many simple and well known properties, Hamiltonian equations are not always the most useful in certain common problems in classical theoretical physics. Non-Hamiltonian equations of motion are often employed to describe the evolution of ``open'' systems (i.e., systems in contact with reservoirs) [, , ], driven and stressed systems [], and constrained systems [, ]. Since real systems should always be regarded, in some sense, as ``open'', both at the microscopic and macroscopic levels, it may be that non-Hamiltonian evolution equations may provide a more realistic description of their behavior [].

Despite their importance and frequent use, a fully consistent formulation of the statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems has never been presented. Moreover, a confusion in the literature on the thermodynamics of non-Hamiltonian systems exists, in spite of recent advances providing an impetus for a new formal development in non-Hamiltonian based statistical theory[, , ]. One of the signatures of non-Hamiltonian flow is that it can have a nonzero phase space compressibility, a property that distinguishes it from the Hamiltonian case, which is always incompressible. Since Hamiltonian flow preserve the measure of phase space, it is usually assumed that this space can be treated mathematically as a Euclidean manifold.

In this letter, the classical statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems will be revisited, and the fundamental concepts needed to develop a full statistical theory will be laid out. It will be shown that the assumption of a Euclidean phase space manifold cannot be made for non-Hamiltonian systems. Thus, in developing statistical mechanical concepts that refer to the geometry of the underlying space for a non-Hamiltonian system, one must treat the phase space as a general Riemannian manifold. It will, nevertheless, be shown that key concepts such as ``invariant measure'' and ``continuity,'' which describe Hamiltonian systems can be generalized to the non-Hamiltonian case by a proper treatment of the geometry of the phase space and that an invariant measure on the phase space manifold can be derived Following this, an equation of continuity, a ``generalized Liouville equation'' for the distribution function of an ensemble of systems evolving according to non-Hamiltonian dynamics, will be derived. The resulting equation will be seen to depend explicitly on the phase space metric and thus can be shown to reduce to the ordinary Liouville equation in the Hamiltonian limit. Finally the manifestation of these generalized concepts in the thermodynamics of non-Hamiltonian systems will be explored.

Consider a non-Hamiltonian dynamical system

  equation50

for the evolution of the n coordinates tex2html_wrap_inline594 with initial values tex2html_wrap_inline596 . The n coordinates describe a point P of an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold tex2html_wrap_inline604 with metric G. If we denote by tex2html_wrap_inline608 the set of all n-tuples of real numbers, then x belongs to this set. The solutions tex2html_wrap_inline614 of Eqs. (3) provide a coordinate transformation on tex2html_wrap_inline604 from the initial coordinates tex2html_wrap_inline596 to the coordinates at time t:

  equation55

Since the generator of the coordinate transformations is the single parameter t, Eqs. (4) describe a one-parameter family of diffeomorphisms[].

Knowledge of the Jacobian of this transformation is essential for an understanding of how the measure on tex2html_wrap_inline604 transforms in time. Using the well known relation for the determinant of a matrix, the Jacobian can be expressed as

  equation60

where the elements of the matrix tex2html_wrap_inline626 are tex2html_wrap_inline628 . Eq. (5) will be used to derive an evolution equation for tex2html_wrap_inline630 . Taking the time derivative of Eq. (5) gives (using the Einstein summation convention on repeated indices)

  equation72

where the quantity tex2html_wrap_inline632 (implied summation over i) is known as the phase space compressibility of the dynamical system. Eq. (6) is subject to the obvious initial condition J(0)=1. Note that for the inverse Jacobian, tex2html_wrap_inline638 , tex2html_wrap_inline640 . Thus, it follows that the equation of motion for tex2html_wrap_inline642 is

  equation94

Eqs. (6) and (7) are not new but were known to Liouville[] and appear elsewhere in the literature (see, for example, Refs.[, ]). Eqs. (6) and (7) predict a nonunit Jacobian for a compressible system. On the manifold tex2html_wrap_inline604 , the metric G has tensor components tex2html_wrap_inline648 in the initial coordinate basis tex2html_wrap_inline650 and components tex2html_wrap_inline652 in the corresponding coordinate basis at time t. These representations of G are, in general, different. The determinants of the metric in these two representations are related by the Jacobian[]:

  equation110

Since J (and tex2html_wrap_inline642 ) are not unity, it is clear that the metric determinant, in general, is also not unity. This means that the phase space must be treated as a general Riemannian manifold with arbitrary curvature, and the volume n-form, which determines the volume element in an arbitrary coordinate system, should be expressed as tex2html_wrap_inline664 , accounting for a nontrivial metric. Moreover, the integral of any function tex2html_wrap_inline666 over the space should be written as[]

  equation122

The expression for the volume n-form, tex2html_wrap_inline670 behaves like a tensor under coordinate transformations, for which there is a Jacobian related to the metric by Eq. (8) [].

Knowledge of the compressibility of a system allows an invariant measure for the manifold to be derived. Suppose that the compressibility tex2html_wrap_inline672 contains no explicit time dependence. Then Eq. (6) for the Jacobian can be easily solved to yield

  equation131

Since tex2html_wrap_inline674 is a total time derivative, a variable w(x), related to the compressibility by tex2html_wrap_inline678 , can be introduced. Eq. (10) can then be written as

  equation136

The wedge product in the volume n-form transforms according to

  equation139

Arranging Eq. (12 so that quantities at time t appear on the left and quantities at t=0 appear on the right leads to:

  equation144

where the conventional volume element has been used. Eq. (13) shows that tex2html_wrap_inline686 is an invariant volume form on the manifold and, by extension, tex2html_wrap_inline688 is an invariant measure. Since the volume form is tex2html_wrap_inline670 , the metric determinant can be identified as tex2html_wrap_inline692 , which satisfies the metric transformation rule tex2html_wrap_inline694 . The existence of an invariant measure means that there is an underlying fixed manifold with possibly nontrivial curvature, for which the metric is determined by the compressibility. Eq. (8) implies that tex2html_wrap_inline696 satisfies the same differential equation as does tex2html_wrap_inline642 : tex2html_wrap_inline700 . Note that for Hamiltonian systems, Eq. (13) reduces to the well known result tex2html_wrap_inline702 and the familiar fixed Euclidean geometry of Hamiltonian phase space. The existence of an invariant measure means that the phase space average of some property, expressed in terms of an integral over the manifold, can be related to the time average of the same property over a trajectory generated by the non-Hamiltonian dynamics Eqs. (3) under the usual assumption of ergodicity. Although the assumption that tex2html_wrap_inline672 contains no explicit time dependence was made, the above formalism is also true for the case that tex2html_wrap_inline672 contains explicit time dependence.

Consider next an arbitrary ensemble described by a distribution function tex2html_wrap_inline708 , i.e., f is a function of n coordinates and time t. A continuity equation for f can be derived by considering the number of ensemble members N(t) in a volume tex2html_wrap_inline720 of the space, is given by tex2html_wrap_inline722 . The continuity condition is that the rate of change of the number of ensemble members within tex2html_wrap_inline720 is balanced by the flux of members through the surface bounding tex2html_wrap_inline720 , which is expressed mathematically as

  equation162

where tex2html_wrap_inline728 is the surface n-1 form, tex2html_wrap_inline732 is the unit normal one-form to the surface, and the surface integral has been converted to a volume integral via a generalization of the divergence theorem to manifolds with nontrivial metrics using the Lie derivative tex2html_wrap_inline734 along the vector tex2html_wrap_inline736 . Thus, Eq. (14) can be written as

  equation178

Eq. (15) must hold independent of the choice of tex2html_wrap_inline720 and thus implies the local continuity condition:

  equation186

Eq. (16) represents a continuity equation for f on an arbitrary manifold but makes no reference to a specific choice of coordinate basis. To project Eq. (16) onto a coordinate basis, we first apply the Leibniz rule[], tex2html_wrap_inline742 to the action of the Lie derivative on the product. The action of the Lie derivative on the scalar f and on the volume form tex2html_wrap_inline746 is well known:

  eqnarray205

where the component representation of the wedge product is given by tex2html_wrap_inline748 , the Levi-Civita tensor[, ]. The last line follows from the properties of the tex2html_wrap_inline748 []. Combining the results of Eq. (17) with Eq. (16) gives the general form for the continuity equation in an arbitrary coordinate basis

equation231

Since the volume n-form is not zero, the term in brackets must, therefore, vanish yielding

  equation235

where tex2html_wrap_inline754 . Eq. (19) is a general form of the Liouville equation, valid on a manifold with a nontrivial metric and hence is valid for an ensemble in which the underlying dynamics is compressible. Recall that tex2html_wrap_inline696 satisfies tex2html_wrap_inline700 . Substituting this into Eq. (19) leads to the conservation condition for f, df/dt=0. Finally, combining this with Eq. (13) leads to the general statement of Liouville's theorem for a non-Hamiltonian system: tex2html_wrap_inline764 Note that for Hamiltonian dynamics, the compressibility vanishes and tex2html_wrap_inline766 . Then, Eq. (19) reduces to the usual Liouville equation, Eq. (1). Finally, we note that Eq. (19) is different from the equation which has hitherto been assumed to be the generalized form of the Liouville equation, tex2html_wrap_inline768 . Eq. (19) can be put in this form by defining a new function tex2html_wrap_inline770 . Such an identification is not general! The consequences of this identification are explored in the following discussion.

The generalized Liouville equation and the invariant measure will be used to derive an important property satisfied by the Gibbs entropy of a system. Consider, first, a Hamiltonian system for which the Gibbs entropy S(t) is given by

  equation260

where k is the Boltzmann constant. Although the standard integral notation has been employed for simplicity, the connection between the volume element and the contraction of the volume form in Eq. (9) (with tex2html_wrap_inline766 ) must be kept in mind. By taking the time derivative of both sides of Eq. (20), using the Hamiltonian form of Liouville's equation, and performing a few integrations by parts, it can be shown that dS/dt=0. Thus, for a Hamiltonian system, the Gibbs entropy, which is a fine-grained quantity[], is constant in time.

The generalization of the Gibbs entropy for a non-Hamiltonian system can be shown to satisfy the same property, when the proper invariant measure is used. Recognizing that the phase space volume element now contains a metric determinant factor, the entropy can be expressed as[]

  equation268

where the metric determinant is assumed to contain no explicit time dependence. Again, the standard integral notation is connected to Eq. (9) through a contraction of the volume n-form, but with tex2html_wrap_inline696 correctly determined by the compressibility. Computing the time derivative of both sides gives

equation274

Performing two integrations by parts and expanding the spatial derivative, it follows that

equation279

since tex2html_wrap_inline784 as can be seen from Eq. (8). Thus, the fine-grained entropy for a non-Hamiltonian system shares the same property as that of a Hamiltonian system, namely, that it remains constant in time. Eq. (21) makes clear the ambiguity associated with the redefinition tex2html_wrap_inline770 . It is necessary to keep the metric separate from the distribution function in order that the entropy be definable in a consistent manner. Further details on this issue can be found in Refs.[, ].

It is instructive to consider, next, a concrete example of a non-Hamiltonian system that is typically used in molecular dynamics calculations, that of the Gaussian isokinetic system[], for which the equations of motion take the form

  equation291

where the dynamics is for a N particle system (unit mass) in d dimensions with phase space vector tex2html_wrap_inline792 and forces tex2html_wrap_inline794 obtained from the negative gradient of a potential function tex2html_wrap_inline796 . The Lagrange multiplier, tex2html_wrap_inline798 , ensures that the constraint of constant total kinetic energy, tex2html_wrap_inline800 , where T is the temperature, is satisfied. tex2html_wrap_inline798 is given explicitly by tex2html_wrap_inline806 . Using this definition of tex2html_wrap_inline798 , the compressibility of Eqs. (24) can be easily computed and is found to be

equation303

where N is assumed to be a large number. Thus, tex2html_wrap_inline812 , and the metric determinant becomes tex2html_wrap_inline814 , leading to the well known result for the partition function generated by Eqs. (24)[]:

  equation313

where the fact that tex2html_wrap_inline816 is the invariant measure has been used. Eq. (26) shows that Gaussian isokinetic dynamics generates a canonical distribution function in the position or configuration space while restricting the momenta to remain on the constant kinetic energy surface. Taking tex2html_wrap_inline818 , it is straightforward to show that the time-independent form of Eq. (19) is satisfied.

In conclusion, a formulation of classical statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems has been presented. No assumptions about the geometry of the underlying phase space have been made. Rather, the space has been treated as a general Riemannian manifold with a nontrivial metric. The connection between the dynamical Jacobian and the phase space compressibility has been reviewed, and it has been shown that the nonunit Jacobian determines the metric determinant on the space. Knowledge of the compressibility also allows an invariant measure on the manifold to be derived. Treating the continuity condition within the framework of a general manifold shows that the hitherto assumed form for the generalized Liouville equation is not correct but rather that the proper generalization is Eq. (19), which explicitly involves the metric determinant. When combined with the invariant measure, the generalized Liouville equation leads to a general statement of Liouville's theorem. Thus, statistical averages can be computed with respect to the coordinates x at any time t. All of the above mentioned results reduce to their Hamiltonian analogs when the compressibility vanishes. These results imply the existence of a smooth phase space distribution function even for non-Hamiltonian systems. Finally, it has been shown that the natural generalization of the fine-grained Gibbs entropy, accounting for the metric on the space, satisfies the relation dS/dt=0, exactly as it does for a closed Hamiltonian system. It would be interesting to explore the consequences of a coarse-graining procedure[] applied to Eq. (21) in relation to the entropy of a nonequilibrium state.




next up previous
Next: Acknowledgements

Mark Tuckerman
Mon Jan 11 08:22:12 EST 1999