On gay marriages.

Normally, I don’t give a shit who does/has sex with what and I really can’t understand why anyone else should (except people who are insecure about their own sexuality, ie most of my friends), but this opposition to gays marrying highlights a severe structural problem in the workings/thought processes of our government and society that must be addressed. The only reasonable explanation for the opposition of gay marriages, is that it may deter from the productivity of society. I’ll explain. This is because gays, regardless if it’s a male or female coupling, cannot reproduce and pass along their genes. Blah blah blah, it is essential for society to propagate itself (least of reasons being, someone is gonna have to pay for the current generations’ pensions one day). So since it is believed that married couples help to maintain/increase society’s productivity, so married couples get all sorts of benefits, like tax deductions and subsidized grain, but gay’s in union are denied this economic incentive. But this is where the reasoning for not supporting gay marriages falls apart.

I will first point out some observations. Men are just not meant to raise kids. Men are more likely to do a better job at killing and eating their kids, than raising them. Not all men, but just in general. Males have been designed to hunt and jump in the way of attacking animals and spears thrown at them, not to mention headbutting other men. I don’t see how this is going to have much of a positive impact on a child. It has even been suggested that having a grandmother around instead of a father might be better for the child’s upbringing and I wouldn’t doubt it (the father, is of course, good for a kid, mainly in resource obtaining, which is quite essential). Doesn’t it make more sense that a lesbian couple would be able to raise more mentally fit kids who will become productive members of society? Two chics equals a lot of nurturing, and that’s good. So the flipside, in a gay marriage two men and no women will probably be disastrous parents. Not true however, because if two males actually want to have kids, they probably really want to have those kids. Males are not programmed for such things as childrearing, so I’d bet that these men have really thought this through, and being phags, are effeminate (the child wanting ones at least) enough that they’d be able to provide to a child the love and support that child needs. There are tons of unfortunate kids in orphanages who could use some decent parents, and yeah, they’d get made fun of a bit, but not only do they benefit, society will be better off when they grow up and kick ass. IF ANYTHING, the government should put regulations on who should and should not reproduce, because there is way too little thought and too many hormones involved in regular reproduction in general. We might actually have fewer kids growing up in loveless homes and possibly becoming criminals. Of course, this will never happen, because jailing people is a very healthy industry in this country, and we wouldn’t want to disappoint the powerful prison lobby in Washington.
The downside to being raised by homos is that some people may make fun of you, and they may judge you as being prone to being a fruit. However, the upside, is that you are much less likely of becoming some vapid, Nascar watching boor, and instead you might become a Spanish moor....or something along those lines. Gay dudes have great fashion sense, as testamated by all these shows on the telé, but fashion blows and is a complete waste of everything. However, I would rather encourage fashionableness over Nascar, because watching cars go around in a circle for three hours at a time is such a waste of such a highly evolved cerebrum.